15 , model
Model governance in Faramesh is about execution trust, not benchmark marketing. You register exactly which model identity is allowed for a workload, then continuously verify runtime claims against that registry. If an agent silently drifts from an approved model to a different snapshot, or a provider alias changes under the hood, Faramesh gives you evidence and a decision surface instead of blind trust.
In practice, model drift creates two classes of incidents: behavioral drift (same prompts, different outcomes) and compliance drift (a now-unapproved model handles regulated data). The registry helps you pin expected identities per workflow, while verification gives you ongoing proof that the model in use is still the one you approved during risk review.
A good operating pattern is: register approved model identities during change management, verify continuously in runtime checks, and wire failures into incident playbooks. Treat model identity mismatches exactly like identity or signature mismatches in other critical systems.
Use strict verification when model behavior can trigger sensitive side effects or regulated data handling.
Register a model version and integrity metadata.
Check that runtime model identity matches what was registered. Verification failures should be treated as policy drift, not as minor warnings.
Compare model identity across environments or workloads to catch staging-production skew, unreviewed model upgrades, and hidden provider alias changes.
Show all registered model identities and status.
Most model governance failures are process failures. Avoid these common mistakes:
Model verification closes a hidden control gap: it proves the runtime model identity that produced governed decisions, not just the policy text that should have applied.
Need help? Use any of these support options.